SetAIComply vs EuroComply for the EU AI Act

EuroComply was, on paper, the competitor closest to us: AI-Act-native, self-serve, EU-hosted, and priced for small companies rather than enterprises. We went to re-check the details for this page on 19 August 2026 and could not reach it. That changes what this page can honestly be, so it starts with what we saw.

What we found when we went to check

eurocomply.app does not answer on HTTPS at all — the connection times out. Plain HTTP redirects to a Namecheap parked-domain placeholder, and the domain's DNS points at Namecheap's parking address. We checked twice, with two different tools, minutes apart. The Internet Archive's most recent successful capture of a working EuroComply site is dated 13 July 2026.

We are not going to tell you what that means, because we do not know. A parked domain can be a lapsed renewal, a migration, or a company winding down, and none of those is distinguishable from outside. What we would say is: put the address in your own browser before you spend an afternoon evaluating the product. If it loads for you, everything below still stands — because everything below describes the product as documented on its own site up to 13 July 2026, which is the last date we can verify.

The honest difference

On the fundamentals these two tools agreed. Both were built around the actual obligations of the EU AI Act rather than bolted onto a security suite, both let you start without a sales call, and both kept your data in the EU — EuroComply hosted in Frankfurt, running its inference on Mistral. Where they diverged was depth.

• Annex IV documentation — SetAIComply auto-generates the 9 sections of Annex IV with Claude, after walking you through applicability and Annex III classification. EuroComply was a genuine AI-Act-native peer on that core classification-and-documents job.
• Languages — SetAIComply covers all 24 official EU languages across both the platform and the generated documents, and the Copilot is grounded in the verbatim text of the Act in every one of them. EuroComply published in four. That is not our estimate: the JSON-LD on its own homepage read "availableLanguage":["en","de","fr","pl"], matching its hreflang tags and its visible language switcher.
• Breadth versus depth — an earlier version of this page said EuroComply stayed inside the AI Act. That was wrong, and correcting it is more useful than quietly deleting it. Its own coverage matrix opened with "EuroComply tracks 19 EU regulatory areas" — GDPR, NIS2, DORA, CRA, MiCA, CSRD and more. The same page also said how deep each went: 2 regulations had full workflow tooling, 2 had a structured self-assessment, and 15 of the 19 were deadline tracking and source-linked guidance. SetAIComply goes the other way — fewer regulations, more of the lifecycle on each, with ISO 42001 on Growth and NIST AI RMF on Scale.
• Pricing — SetAIComply is self-serve from €0, then Starter €39/mo, Growth €129/mo, Scale €349/mo and Enterprise €9,588/yr; see the full plan list. EuroComply was free outright — its pricing page said "no credit card, no time limit, no paid tiers", funded by partner referrals rather than subscriptions. The "€0–€1,499" figure sometimes attached to EuroComply, including by us on an earlier version of this page, was never its price. It was the market band it said it wanted to serve.

What EuroComply got right

Worth saying even now. It was self-serve with no demo gate, it was free, it was hosted in Frankfurt, and it ran its inference on Mistral — European models on European infrastructure, which matters to a lot of compliance-minded buyers. It was also unusually candid about its own limits: its sovereignty page said plainly "EuroComply is not claiming a fully sovereign stack", and named Supabase-on-AWS and Vercel as US corporate exposure. We would rather compete with vendors who write like that.

When SetAIComply is the better fit

Setting the outage aside, the decision came down to depth. SetAIComply auto-generates the 9 sections of Annex IV with Claude and grounds its Copilot in the verbatim text of the Act across all 24 official languages, so both the guidance and the finished documents come out in the language your team and your regulator actually use. It also spans more than one framework as you grow, with ISO 42001 on Growth and NIST AI RMF on Scale, plus DPIAs, a regulatory radar, shadow-AI detection, bias testing and vendor management in one EU-hosted workspace.

FAQ

Is EuroComply still operating? We cannot tell you. On 19 August 2026 its domain served a parked-domain placeholder and did not answer on HTTPS, and the last archived working capture is from 13 July 2026. Check it yourself — that is a one-minute test, and it is more current than anything we can publish.

Is SetAIComply EU-hosted? Yes — 100% EU-hosted in Amsterdam, GDPR-native, encrypted end to end, with a DPA available. We are not SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certified and do not claim to be.

Do the AI Act obligations still apply after the Omnibus changes? Yes. Some dates shifted under the Digital Omnibus, but the obligations still land — and buyers and investors are asking for AI Act evidence now, so early readiness is a commercial advantage.

Start free — no account needed

Not sure whether the EU AI Act applies to you, or whether your system is high-risk? Start with the free, no-account tools — the EU AI Act risk checker and the 2-minute exposure snapshot — and see where you stand before you pick a tool. Want the full product overview? See the EU AI Act compliance software page.